The short answer
No, and it doesn't need to be. Your first home's job is to get you started. A modest home you can afford comfortably is usually a stronger start than a stretch for the home you'll want in fifteen years.
Mine definitely was not
My first home was a two-bedroom row house. Nothing glamorous. But it was ours.
We bought it in early 2007, seven years after I landed in Australia as a student, with 95% borrowed. We'd looked at rentals and nothing felt right. If we were going to compromise anyway, why not compromise on something we actually own?
In 2024, seventeen years later, we built the home I used to dream about. The row house came first.
You won't feel sure
You will not feel sure. Nobody does.
The ones who struggle are not the people who bought something imperfect. They're the people who kept waiting to feel sure.
That doesn't mean buy anything. It means know what matters most, and be clear about what you're happy to give up for now.
Questions to settle before you start looking
- What has to be true about this home for the next five to ten years?
- What would you give up to own sooner? A second bathroom, a garage, a bigger yard, a longer drive to work?
- At this price, do you still keep a buffer after settlement?
- If your plans change in five years, could you move on from it without it hurting?
A first home you can hold comfortably gives you options later. A dream home you can barely hold takes them away.
Related questions
- How much should I spend on my first home?
- Is paying LMI ever worth it?
- How long does it take to buy a first home after moving to Australia?
Get one of these every week
Before You Sign is my weekly email for first home buyers. Plain English, from over 15 years in lending. Launching early 2027.
Join the waitlistGot a question you'd like answered? Email jigar@jigarmodi.com.au. I read every one, and the best ones become pages like this.
This is general information, not personal advice. Rules change, so check what applies to you now.
